Things are happening! We see them and WE Don’t! OMG, Is not a call for God’s help. He hears – and knows – It really means OH MY GODS, ALL of them, All the gods of the world. There are so many gods in our life especially after the pandemic, Which may not be past yet. I find myself, as I think more are, being ‘in this world’ but feeling ‘not of this world’. I am an observer. The world – it is a’changing!
Police brutality is replaced with citizen power. You don’t like a law, just ignore it this once. No one important will see you.
The big example, If you see that you will loose an election just call out that there is an attempt to STEEL the election. No one will believe that it is you trying to steel it. That just could not be.
The speed limit too low? Ignore it. The people you pass cannot stop you. There are no police around to force a low speed. If it were necessary to go slow for a reason, that reason would have brought police into the area to enforce it. Otherwise it is just a guide line. And so forth.
WTF is not taking the Lord’s name in vain, so no commandment broken. Just an attempt of a small mind to express itself forcefully. And a cry of amasement at experiencing something that just could/should not be happening.
IDK – A strange thing happened today. I SAW a PERSON with a THING that was BROKEN. He was using it as though it were in good and working condition. I stopped to help him FIX the THING because it was not so broken that it could not be fixed. I was told that he had PURPOSEFULLY broken it. He wanted to be JUSTIFIED ridding himself of the THING because he was tired of doing the work with it.
On June 15, 2020 I inquired to AXIOS.COM about an article presented by APPLE. news@axios.com.
In an article yesterday https://apple.news/Au79C6C-PRna1uNK5q_bihQ you warn me of fraud schemes. What is being done about this environment? What is being done about the perps? Is anything being done more than telling me it happens? I feel this is THE area we need to change in this new normal. The laws has made this possible just as police abuse?
jennifer.kingson@axios.com replied with “Thanks for writing. There have been a number of prosecutions related to the latest fraud schemes. Law enforcement agencies and other interested parties are tracking things closely and tell me they are doing all they can to fight back — and also that it takes vigilance on the part of consumers to report what they see. I appreciate your concern for the issue and thank you for reading Axios!”
I replied for more information with “Hello Jennifer, The statement you made is just what I have been hearing. “Law enforcement agencies and other interested parties are tracking things closely and tell me they are doing all they can to fight back“. I fear What that actually means is ’there is nothing they can do’ . This seems to be because they involve text messages and websites. I’m hearing it has to do with jurisdictions. Examples that I have reported: 1. text/email msg from Verizon and Wells Fargo that come from a Gmail account. 2. ATT suport email that says there is a problem with subscriber email account sent from Yahoo and Gmail addresses. 3. text msg about covid-19 that says to contact a website given in the text that is still operational until I lookup the website stats and report the abuse to the ISP and the website is taken down. Instances like these indicate to me that “all they can do” is very far from enough. And it is ridiculous to see Police departments issue warning to be careful instead of Prosecuting. If it is the laws as written that form this barrier the laws need to be exposed and changed. Can you help verify these seemingly accurate conclusions? Thank you.” I received no response
so I concluded on Jun 17, 2020 “I assume, because I have not seen your reply to the contrary, that my fears about your statement being without material content is true! I have been hoping the ’New Normal’ could include a completion of the Freedom movement of the mid 20th century which deteriorated into an effective Rights movement. The concept that Freedoms, from the constitutions, is composed of Rights and Responsibilities, was too complex for the times and may still be. The idea that Rights can be violated without incurring the Responsibility for the action is too ingrained in our Judicial System and Way-of-Life to be questioned. I regret the first computer virus that was injected into PCs was tolerated instead of prosecuted. But it did start a whole new industry of antivirus programs. I will continue my efforts at https://ooh-icu.spiritways.us Thank you for your attention but no thanks for the followup.”
President Barack ObamaPresident Barack ObamaOfficial Presidential Picture(photo)
But the above-displayed image does not show Obama’s official White House portrait. It is actually a painting by Dutch artist Edwin van den Dikkenberg and has no official connections to the White House or Obama.
Another portrait of Obama was also shared on social media as if it were the portrait scheduled to be unveiled at the White House in 2020
This painting of Obama was done by Kehinde Wiley and was unveiled at the Smithsonian’s National Portrait Gallery in February 2018. While this an official portrait of Obama, it is not the official White House portrait that would have been unveiled at the White House ceremony in 2020.
The official White House portraits are commissioned by the White House Historical Association, and are distinct from the portraits hanging in the National Portrait Gallery. Official White House portraits are traditionally unveiled by the president’s predecessor near the end of their first term, and end up displayed (or stored) at the White House.
It’s been a White House tradition for decades: A first-term president hosts a ceremony in the East Room for the unveiling of the official portrait of his immediate predecessor that will hang in the halls of the White House for posterity.
Official White House portraits are separate from the presidential portraits that hang in the National Portrait Gallery in Washington, where the Obamas’ were unveiled in February 2018.
The process for the White House portraits begins near the end of a president’s term or soon after, and it takes a few years to complete.
The 44th president looks elegant and confident in his official portrait—but nothing about his expression or appearance would make it, on its own, a particularly signature or memorable image.
Lyle Hoover, waiting outside for his first haircut since the lockdown, thought it was about time. “As this thing barrels on, I can’t help but think we’re being manipulated.”
“There’s no organization. There’s no real plan. Just open up and we’ll see what happens,” she said.(Tara Brendle) “We all know there’s going to be a resurgence in cases. But if they don’t know what to do, I sure as hell don’t.”
Confidence in the governor was not enhanced when Parson decided to mark the reopening by touring an electrical contractor and a hunting and fishing store without wearing a face mask, in a pointed rejection of federal health recommendations. “I think it’s up to the individual,” Parson said in response to a question during his afternoon news conference. “I don’t think its government’s role to mandate who wears a mask and who doesn’t.” “I chose not to,” he said. “I don’t think that it is government’s role to mandate who wears one.” Even as the state endured its largest increase in coronavirus cases on Monday, Missouri’s Republican governor, Mike Parson, decided to press ahead with his plan to allow businesses to reopen and to lift restrictions on social gatherings imposed as the pandemic crept closer six weeks ago.
Last week, Vice President Mike Pence chose not to wear a mask while touring the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, in apparent violation of the medical center’s policy requiring them.
Monday May 4, 2020. We are letting loose of the virus. It seems like time and it seems too early. For me it is too early. For all of us older seniors, too fat and ugly to run fast enough to stay ahead. And smart enough to realize that there is something hurting our nation more than the virus.
I thought it was apathy. People not caring about what happens. But I don’t that’s on the money either. Why do I feel there is not right? Is it because I personally don’t like what is happening? But I don’t dislike what is happening either?
Then IT hit me! I can’t do anything. Wait, I can’t do anything about IT. Oh I can do, just not do anything about IT. I feel used. Yes that is IT, I feel used! Everyone is using me. The should not be using me. And then I remembered a book I started about a witch hunt and I remembered feeling that I was the person using others. Who were they? OH! women, and men in power were using, taking advantage of, women! And Yep I was indeed a man. Can’t do anything about that either (although some men have tried. BUT another topic). I read it again. “and men in power were using, taking advantage of, women!” If there is anything that I do not have it is power! That was close.
In all the gin joints, in all the places, in all the World, . . . Wait Walter. Don’t go off on a Dream. We will use the same tool we as a country has used for years. Give THEM the Rights they are lacking. It is what we sent to war for. The right not to be English. Right? Right! Right. There was a concept that came before, FREEDOM. Now some try to say that that is the same thing. If you have rights you are FREE. and if you are FREE you have rights. Almost and true are the response to that. Can you see it? The war was for FREEDOM from England not . . . The thing that was added was RIGHTS. and the founding fathers figured that was good because they were good men and good men expect other men to be good. Notice I say men because back in those times men did and women . . .
Our founding father need us to replace what was assumed at the time our nation was conceived. The thing that they took, and took for granted, in founding our nation. They took responsibility by signing their names (and credit only because they did not fail).
In the above discussion we expect responsibility to be taken. And when IT is not IT becomes the IT that actually bothers us. Our entire court system, judicial system, corporate system, is in place to Make This Happen. (Well maybe not the corporate system that is in place now because it actually lets executives hide behind the corporate mask.) IT forces the few people convicted to take responsibility for IT. I asked a young girl what she did wrong in school. She said “get caught”. We teach them young. I told her no and explained but life teaches the opposite lesson. If the powerful men in the little story were forced to accept responsibility for taking advantage of women balance would be restored. If the people that first created a computer were forced to accept responsibility for taking advantage of our computer, balance would be restored. If every person using a Right were forced to accept responsibility for All The Actions caused by them balance would be restored. If FREEDOM were forced to balance rights with responsibility for actions caused I would feel better. IT is due!
Excess deaths measure the difference between the number of deaths expected to occur without the pandemic and the number of actual deaths recorded. This accepts the state that “we don’t know” into the figures. This is what is needed at this time. It may have helped to focus on Covid-19 at first but now we need a bigger picture. April 28, 2020 Top Stories from Google Search for US
Yin-Yang is a fundamental concept in Chinese philosophy where seemingly opposite or contrary forces are interconnected and interdependent on each other. These forces give rise to each other as they interrelate to one another. The interaction between Yin and Yang establishes harmony and gives birth to things. In the image below representing Freedom something is missing.
Freedom
The civil rights movement was an organized effort by black Americans to end racial discrimination and gain equal rights under the law. It began in the late 1940s and ended in the late 1960s. Although tumultuous at times, the movement was mostly nonviolent and resulted in laws to to protect every American’s constitutional rights, regardless of color, race, sex or national origin. As a result of (and along with) this movement Rights Movements targeting all areas of Rights were positioned to fight and win. Civil Rights in the Military, Women’s Rights, Children’s Rights, Student’s Rights, Animal Rights, Immigrant Rights, . . . . . . . . . These are not Bad in any way except ‘They Lack Something’. They missed entirely the necessary balance of Freedom. The Yang was missed, is missing. Freedom is MISSING in history because of this imbalance and without the Balance our Freedom is failing. And our country can be and is controlled and kept from Greatness.
As the Cold War began, President Harry Truman initiated a civil rights agenda, and in 1948 issued Executive Order 9981 to end discrimination in the military.
On December 1, 1955, a 42-year-old woman named Rosa Parks found a seat on a Montgomery, Alabama bus after work. Segregation laws at the time stated blacks must sit in designated seats at the back of the bus, and Parks had complied.
When a white man got on the bus and couldn’t find a seat in the white section at the front of the bus, the bus driver instructed Parks and three other blacks to give up their seats. Parks refused and was arrested.
Women’s rights movement, also called women’s liberation movement, diverse social movement, largely based in the United States, that in the 1960s and ’70s sought equal rights and opportunities and greater personal freedom for women. It coincided with and is recognized as part of the “second wave” of feminism.
The Children’s Rights Movement is a historical and modern movement committed to the acknowledgment, expansion, and/or regression of the rights of children around the world. It began in the early part of the last century and has been an effort by government organizations, advocacy groups, academics, lawyers, lawmakers, and judges to construct a system of laws and policies that enhance and protect the lives of children.
Internationally the deficit exist also – The right to education is reflected in international law in Article 26 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia “The right to education also includes a responsibility to provide basic education for individuals who have not completed primary education from the school and college levels. In addition to these access to education provisions, the right to education encompasses the obligations of the students to avoid discrimination at all levels of the educational system, to set minimum standards of education and to improve the quality of education.” Do you see the mistake? Don’t feel bad. I don’t see why it is missed. But it is EVERY TIME. The whoever all might purveyor of rights and responsibility Gives THE RIGHT to the individual and A RESPONSIBILITY to whoever. No surprise. Even when it is stated in black and white. It cannot work when one individual is given, takes, and accepts his Right and someone else not related to the situation is expected to pick up the Responsibility. The someone mentioned here has no ‘skin in the game’ ‘something to gain’ ‘benefit from’. And the ‘one individual’ has Nothing to lose. And we cannot understand why there are Gangs, Bankers, Politicians, Deep State, Criminals.
This all started for me with CoVid-19Anon.com, a website, with someone behind it who sent a text with the goal of hurting someone they did not even know! I tried to find a law that was broken and found “If there can be laws that could govern the Internet”. There are NO laws to govern the Internet. Daaaaaa. The internet did not do anything, how could it ever break the law. Why do we need laws for something that does not do anything. AI? Not yet. the person who created the web, NO, the person who created the website,NO, the person who got the telephone number, NO, the person who sent the text, YES. He had the right to send the text and the responsibility for what he purposed for the text. If the recipient had followed the instructions on the text and harm was done because the right to send the text was used the responsibility goes with the right. It is not my Responsibility to protect myself. AS the lost boys say “kill the criminal”. Put Responsibility with the Right. If one exercises a Right incorrectly, He accepts the Responsibility. The responsibility does not go to someone or something else. Only when WE as a people, country, world, group,. . . put responsibility with the right will Freedom be balanced and in order. The Bill of Rights needs to be amended to The Bill of Rights and Responsibilities for all. THE FUTURE OF THE GROUP
from my Facebook post. It was there! and tucows.com and squarespace.com know WHO and WHERE.
With Thomaston P.D. and the Georgia Attorney General both warning the people instead of arresting anyone it is OUR turn. You know someone who knows someone who knows someone who can find this person. Will you join a campaign to make virtual attacks like CoVid-19Anon.com illegal? I don’t know how.
Why are we Victims? Because WE allow it? We have laws to protect us from everything. We need to Make creating/distributing a computer virus and creating/hosting website for scams both crimes THEN put the criminals down. It is a crime to attack someone! These are senior citizens who have faith in what they are told and see. If a person is holding a smoking gun(the source of one of these) they are presumed guilty and could try to prove innocence.
I have too much time. BUT The only laws/rules that I can find is ‘Know Your Rights!’ I Cannot find responsibilities anywhere. We need to define responsibility. Lets take all the Rights and just Amend the Responsibility Clause !?>- Comment if you agree that rights bring responsibilities. I just cannot believe that non-criminals believe in Rights without any Responsibility ! Maybe WE deserve what we get?
Why do we always need to be victims? Will you join a campaign to make virtual attacks like CoVid-19Anon.com illegal? I don’t know how. CoVid-19Anon.com is real with a person behind it.
I found another thought. “If there can be laws that could govern the Internet, then. . .” This is why everything before got stuck. Rights and Responsibilities are for people not things. People use things; they are responsible for what they do. If a person hits another with a hammer you don’t say the hammer broke a law. There are no laws for the internet as there are no laws for hammers. ALSO the internet has no RIGHTS. Could it be this simple. FBI, Congresspeople, Donald T, Anyone out there. Protect us from People not things. Scams will go away? Target the People that do wrong! Your turn. >>>>>
Is this anon referring to QAnon? Related to 2017 – #WWG1WGA? The tweet included a video of a woman praising Trump’s approach to urban poverty and included the hashtag #WWG1WGA, which stands for the QAnon slogan “Where we go one, we go all.”? Is this scam somehow related to politics and President Trump? December 27 reporter says “President Donald Trump retweeted a video message on Friday morning with a hashtag referencing a fringe pro-Trump conspiracy theory known as QAnon.” Earlier this year, the FBI designated QAnon a possible domestic terrorism threat.
The story of ‘communities of color bearing the brunt of suffering is tragically a familiar one in our history’ but not for the reason that you think. I have been following the pandemic for quite a time now. What else is there to do? There has been a drop in actual new articles in the last week so I expected the aim of reporting to move to a different area. The story of communities color bearing the brunt of suffering is tragically a familiar one in our history. It started out with stories about the conditions of communities in big cities showing pictures of communities of color but no stating it. The implication bothered me also. Notice it says STORY because the story is tragically a familiar one. I would expect the storyline ‘communities that are not following Social Distancing Guidelines are bearing the brunt of suffering’. But alas no. It seems that without DATA or the benefit of medical science, we conclude that “Black people dying from coronavirus at much higher rates in cities across the USA” is a much better headline! Higher, the ‘er’ form, compares 2 things but the second is left to our imagination. Maybe because my imagination is better than your I will complete the statement with ‘than Black people dying from coronavirus in Rural America‘. There is no DATA for this conclusion and it is not racist. Let’s try another ending. Black people dying from coronavirus at much higher rates in cities across the USA than Black people in another country afflicted by the coronavirus. I’m not sure that another country has DATA to compare to if we had DATA. This would be an interesting study, maybe, but would not help curb the spread the virus and it is not racist Let’s try another ending. Black people dying from coronavirus at much higher rates in cities across the USA than White people in the same situation are dying from coronavirus in cites across the USA. Now this is something. And this is what I think is the implied ending. There is NO data collected to prove of disprove this conclusion most likely because the virus does not show any racial preference and this is racist! It is ‘tragically a familiar one in our history’ because 1. history repeats itself; 2. the reasoning worked in the past; 3. advances a political agenda; 4. it furthers the ‘its not my fault, it is somebody else’s; 5. my rights have been violated. And all without stating a conclusion that can be denied.
So I found atricles for a reading list to address the issue. What I found is a shock. It seems that the pandemic is more deadly!( and I leave the reading to you )
Goes under many different names: Shelter in Place, Stay-at-home, Stay Healthy, Stay-at-home, Stay Healthy at Home. All the plans have the 2 important goals. 1. Be in a position that will protect (minimize) your opportunity to be exposed to anyone with the coronavirus. 2. Stay in a place where you cannot (minimize) exposing others to anything you may have and not know! This is very important since it was discovered that a person without symptoms can transmit the virus others. The Tampa megachurch from the ‘Too Good to Miss’ post missed both points, the attendees were not verified Covid-free and after the service everyone left to resume normal contacts. The better scenario would have been 1 Test before the service. 2 Keep together for the duration as an isolation camp/retreat for religious activities. No one could fault any group for that schedule. The captain of a nuclear aircraft carrier TR, Capt. Brett Crozier, probably felt responsible because he did not act soon enough to prevent the infection. Chief of Naval Operations, Adm. Mike Gilday, told reporters it was unclear if sailors became infected following the ship’s previous port of call in early March to Da Nang, Vietnam. Gilday said they debated whether to go on with the Vietnam visit, but at the time there were only 16 coronavirus cases in northern Vietnam and the port was in the central part of the country. This was the mistake that, to me, is obvious in retrospect. At this time no one knew how easily the Covid-19 was spreading. Sailors were screened prior to returning on board. The first three sailors tested positive 15 days after leaving Vietnam. This is the 14 day isolation period the since been requested. Up to this point, assuming all new assignees were screened/tested, the TF was a perfect isolation case. All crew had been healthy for much more that 14 days already with no infection and all predictions point to the crew staying in that safe condition as long as necessary. In wartime this port-of-call would have most likely been skipped. The leave time off ship is an example of what opening the isolation can do. In our Stay-Safe actions at home, this continues to be the vulnerable time.
& Recovery? An Explanation for we don’t know. Why don’t we know how many people have recovered from COVID-19 in Florida? One item that has not been included in any of the state’s reports: how many people in Florida have recovered from the coronavirus. That’s because the state is not measuring that statistic. “We do not currently measure “recovery,” and don’t expect to have such a designation anytime in the near future. Recovery can mean a lot of things — some countries say you’re recovered 14 days from infection even if you are still sick, or even dead, based on a computer algorithm that calculates the amount of time passed since a case is first reported.The very definition of recovery is a contested issue — are you recovered once you’re no longer symptomatic, or contagious, once you get a negative test result, or no longer require hospitalization? Are you ever “recovered” if you suffer long-term effects from having the virus? Until some of these issues and definitions are worked out at the local, state and national level, we will not be providing a metric for recovery.”
It started with 